Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (28095)	1/15/1999 11:53:00 AM
From: DEWWY	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

...my analysis is not "errant", it is absolutely correct,that is, Starr has never met Lewinsky, never talked to her, never heard her directly. Yet she is the most important witness in this very high profile case. You are saying that he "delegated many important tasks to competent deputies" including the most important task (as lead prosecutor) of KNOWING the most important witness! This so called "delegation" strikes me as avoidance or maybe he was too busy at the time working with his tobacco company clients...at any rate these actions are not impressive, not thorough, not competent. Starr did, on the other hand, go to great lengths to organize the secret tape recording of Lewinsky without her knowledge in a most manipulative and underhanded fashion. Perhaps actions like these can be construed as part of a job being conducted thoroughly and competently, but they're ugly and absurd. History will not look kindly on Starr for these actions. It boggles my mind that people like you are blind to these things.