Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (28130)	1/15/1999 12:21:00 PM
From: DMaA	Respond to of 67261

Editor fired for turning JAMA into just another political rag: search.washingtonpost.com

To: Borzou Daragahi who wrote (28130)	1/15/1999 2:45:00 PM
From: Johannes Pilch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

>At least Larry Flynt is up front and open about what he's doing, instead of clandestinely funding some obscure "think" tank.< Yes, and should David Duke or someone of his ilk decide to submit scum against his adversaries, this, as forthrightly as has Flynt, I should expect you to spread his filth also, should it result in a “legal” document. I should also expect you to give kudos to Duke for his forthrightness. Of course by no means will I actually expect any of this, filthy liberals being what they are. It would have been better had Flynt remained under his rotted cadaver to do his corrupt deeds. At least this would have afforded us a greater illusion of uprightness than we have currently; and it would have allowed many of us who are not filthy liberals to continue, unhampered, to aspire to the ideal. With the open work of Flynt, and with its tacit acceptance and even propagation by liberals, we now have all claimed it well and good to declare open war upon one another. Should Scaife or your “right-wing wackos” openly wage war against you or against any other filthy liberal, the flagrancy of their doing so is now logically insignificant. Any filthy liberal who now allows himself to be identified as liberal is open for assault. So now you in Chicago, Filth in Wisconsin and Michelle in California are all logically available to be openly assaulted and if possible destroyed should anyone in this country deem it worthwhile to place a bounty upon your heads. [Up to $15,000US to anyone who has remarkably damaging information on Danny Filth of Wisconsin, Michelle Lunatic of California and Borzou Darasomethingorother of Chicago.] I should expect all sorts of wonderful liberal kudos to be given me immediately. Had liberals roundly denounced Flynt, sending him back to his rotted abode, the thing would have been held to covertness, and here the combatants and accomplices would necessarily have been relatively few. Now all bets are off, as they say. We are all logically involved because we accepted the flagrancy of the hostility. We know of and accept it, and those who refuse to denounce Flynt would be acting hypocritically should they take issue with Flynt's tactics being used against themselves. Flynt is a filthy pornographer who should never have been given open voice in this society. He is an obscene manifestation of the gross malignancy represented by Bill Clinton. That liberals embrace him confirms the fact of their being whores beyond belief. Give me the so-called Religious Right, with their warts and all, any day of the week.