Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (28135)	1/15/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 67261

You've got the JLA motor mouth disease today.

To: Bill who wrote (28135)	1/15/1999 5:33:00 PM
From: DEWWY	Respond to of 67261

I view not meeting Lewinsky directly a far more telling and serious matter than delving gratuitously into intimate sexual details. For the latter, who knows, there may have been some far-fetched but reasonable(legal) argument for doing so. But not showing simple personal integrity in assuring himself as lead prosecutor of the legitimacy of his key witness - her position, her story, her feelings, and even her own personal integrity - discredits, in my opinion, his whole case. The arguments citing delegation, dependence on "competent deputies",etc.,as surrogates for his own individual in-depth assessment of the focal evidence/sources supporting the key allegations, don't wash. Not in this case, where Starr is the de facto arbiter on allegations leading to the possible removal of the President of this Nation. To me his actions (or inactions) are totally without merit and highly irresponsible. And frankly I don't trust what he says anymore because of this. It also shows a kind of arrogance and elitism towards "little" people which regrettably is getting to be the hallmark of his whole prosecutorial program.