To: O'Hara who wrote (23927 ) 1/15/1999 1:29:00 PM From: mark silvers Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
Shalom, You may believe what ever you want. However, the truth is you posted about conversations with god directly after Dan and I had posted many times concerning the book conversations with god, and what having a conversation with god entails. I dont think it is necessary for me to go back and reprint all that information. I took nothing out of context. You are the one trying to do that. <<,Not to mention Dan most of all who, have been quite patient with, and kind to you. Only to have their good nature turned on its face and used against them by you. >> Really? I think it is I who am being patient with you . I am certainly more tolerant of your beliefs than you are of mine. In fact, I have refrained from some converations, with only the sole reason because I did not want to speak against prevailing beliefs. Do you call that turning on people? I doubt very much that Dan, Nancy, Alan, or Steve, would say that I have turned on them in any way. We don't agree on everything, but I have never turned on them. I have always been extremely respectful of their opinions and beliefs, going way out of my way to make sure that they feel I am being respectful of their beliefs and of them as people. In fact, I would guess(hope) that most here feel that way. It is my opinions that your claims to the contrary are an attempt by you to do the vey things you claim I do. <<You are notorious here for misrepresenting, and totally twisting and taking out of context an entire post>> If you can get three people to state they believe this to be true of me, I will leave this thread. If you can't will you admit that you are wrong? This is the second time you have made statements like this. You previously said that everyone handled me with kid gloves. That is not true, and I believe that I have been extremely respectful and have gone out of my way to tread lightly where it concerns people's beliefs on this thread. Again, I wonder if you can get anymore than couple of people to agree with your outlandish(IMO) statement. mark