Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (35073)	1/15/1999 1:15:00 PM
From: IceShark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

dennis, you mind explaining that comment by AJC a bit clearer? Regards, Ice

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (35073)	1/15/1999 1:19:00 PM
From: Mark Fowler	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 164684

as market share and other measures of market dominance.<< I agree with this. I bought Yhoo because it's close to the bottom of the trading range it has correct over 30 percent.

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (35073)	1/16/1999 4:38:00 PM
From: llamaphlegm	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

<<<mark, AJ Cohen in her San Jose speech just said that the usual criteria for valuaing path-breaking technologies like the net and net companies are not as appropriate as market share and other measures of market dominance. Hmm.>>> dmp your cognitive filter is remarkable your quote was in response to a question: "when if ever will we ever see realistic valuations on internet companies?" she also said in response to this question, we've seen this before with biotech stocks, gold, oil, and for those who remember the 50's mania -- household appliance companies -- for someone whose firm just took ebay public and is about to do the same for bks.com among others, her reply was remarkably candid