SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rob S. who wrote (35107)1/16/1999 12:28:00 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph  Respond to of 164684
 
January 16, 1999

U.S. Officials Try to Sell Encryption Policy in Valley

By PETER WAYNER

UPERTINO, Calif. -- The Clinton Administration's campaign against exporting strong secret
computer codes took to the road on Friday as the President's Export Council Subcommittee on
Encryption held a meeting in Silicon Valley to try and build bridges between the computer
industry and the government.

Little harmony emerged, however, as the industry representatives turned a cold eye to the
Administration's recent proposals and complained that increased foreign competition was in danger of
surpassing American companies.

The Administration's campaign to restrict cryptography
seemed to lose momentum this week as some foreign
executives suggested that changes in a new international
agreement announced last year might have little effect in
practice. The new rules, which are an diplomatic
agreement between the United States and 32 other
Western countries, would require each country to
require special permits before allowing the export of
mass-market software containing encryption. Some
executives now suggest that some countries may simply
satisfy this requirement by issuing blanket permits that
do little to contain encryption technology.

The Administration's position was further complicated
by an announcement by Representative Zoe Lofgren, a
California Democrat, who told the attendees at the
meeting on Friday that she would plan to re-introduce
legislation to liberalize export controls. Earlier versions
of the bill were the basis of a strong battle in Congress that ended in a stalemate. She suggested that she
would push for liberalization of export rules once Congress finishes determining the fate of President
Clinton's impeachment.

"I frankly think that all of this mess in Washington heightens people awareness," she said. "Grandma
and grandpa are e-mailing their grandkids. They're not hiding anything."

The committee itself is made up of representatives from the major government bodies like that
National Security Agency, major corporations like Motorola and IBM, universities and the legal
profession. The first discussions of the morning centered on identifying which tasks the committee
would undertake given that most admitted that little agreement was likely.

The battle over the United States' control over the export of encryption software has always been
between the arms of the government associated with defending national security and the computer
industry. The government agencies like the National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of
Investigation feel that strong secret codes make it possible for terrorists, criminals and foreign
countries to shield their actions from scrutiny. The computer industry suggests that average people
also need codes to protect the confidentiality of their personal and financial information.

In recent years, the Clinton Administration has turned to a
relatively informal mechanism for trying to convince the outside
countries to adopt U.S.-style rules intended to stem the flow of
secret code software. The new international pact on encryption,
called the Wassenaar agreement, is not a treaty, but a diplomatic
arrangement binding many of the Western countries that once
united to fight the Soviet Union. It sets goals for restricting all
sorts of weaponry like armored cars and includes software under
this umbrella.

The first major speaker of the meeting was William A. Reinsch,
the official responsible for leading the Commerce Department's
Bureau of Export Affairs. He began by announcing that he had little to say, in part because his bureau
was "in a cleanup period right now" trying to solve unintended problems caused by the new
regulations issued in December. He promised that his bureau was also working on more new
regulations that would bring the U.S. regulations in compliance with the Wassenaar agreement.

The new version of the Wassenaar agreement states that there would be no need for regulation of
software that protected information with encryption algorithms with no more than 64 bits. This was
portrayed as a liberalization because previous U.S. rules drew the line at 56 bits. Ira Rubenstein, a
senior corporate lawyer from Microsoft, who attended the meeting, suggested that this was not really
liberalization since the mass-market software was not controlled at all by the Wassenaar agreement.

In fact, this lack of control was cited by Canada last year when it decided to let the Canadian subsidiary
of Entrust Technologies freely export its full-strength security software throughout the world. The
Wassenaar agreement was expected to hamper this push by a Canadian company because the company
would be required to get a permit.

There are new indications that the Canadians may simply issue blanket permits. John Ryan, the
president of Entrust Technologies, said in a telephone interview earlier this week that the Canadian
government was very pro-industry and he expected little real problem. "When you net it all out, we
don't think there will be a significant change," he said. "We actually believe that most countries will
just issue blanket permits." He added, "The effect of the change will be very modest, if any."

In fact, the effects may even be more liberal. France, one of the few European countries with stiff
regulations on encryption, may be loosening its grip in order to foster electronic commerce. The
French publication Liberation on Thursday reported that the Finance Minister, Dominique
Strauss-Khan, said that the French were at the mercy of "large ears" who did not care about personal
privacy. This may simply be a reference to credit card thieves who snag account numbers through
illicit wiretaps or it could be a veiled reference to United States spy agencies, which are often believed
to eavesdrop on a significant fraction of the telephone and Internet traffic in Europe. The article
reported that she said, "I want to make cryptography widely available."

Several people at the meeting suggested that the Clinton
Administration often stretched and even violated the spirit of
the Wassenaar by permitting the export of high quality
encryption devices to countries like China. When this happens,
other countries sometimes view the regulations as just a cynical
ploy to help U.S. industry instead of a sincere effort.

The Clinton Administration faces further problems convincing
non-Western countries to follow its lead. This week in India,
the Defense Research and Development Organization warned
Indians to avoid American-made encryption software, saying
that the U.S. government only allowed the export of software
that was easy to break in order to facilitate espionage.

Ryan contends that this worry is often a problem for Entrust's sales force. He said, "The No. 1 pitch of
our competitors is 'The cryptographic work was done in Europe so you can trust it.'"

In fact, many other countries are quickly becoming centers of cryptographic excellence. The American
company RSA Data Security based in San Mateo, Calif., recently hired two Australian programmers to
help solidify its offerings in Web security. The two programmers had gained notice for distribution
one of the most widely used versions of SSL, one of the most common forms of security used to
protect credit card purchases on the Internet. All purchases at Amazon.com, for instance, are shielded
by SSL-based technology.

The meeting on Friday itself just marks the beginning of many security-related events in the San
Fransisco Bay Area. Next week, the annual RSA Data Security conference will begin in San Jose and
many companies will be announcing new products and initiatives.