To: Peter O'Brien who wrote (28261 ) 1/15/1999 7:15:00 PM From: sea_biscuit Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 67261
By the way, I can turn the same argument on you... Those who never complained in the past about corporate executives being intimidated by sexual harassment laws *SIGNED BY CLINTON HIMSELF* should not whine now when Clinton comes under the same scrutiny... FYI, those who are complaining now are doing so only from the perspective of impeachment . Many (me included) don't have any objections whatsoever to Clinton being subjected to a regular court trial after he leaves office.So, am I to assume that there are only 900 "constitutional scholars" in this country? Just because 900 people believe something, that is enough to make it so? Don't you realize that 900 is a substantially large number? Especially when we are talking about something as esoteric as constitutional law? Besides, it is not just 900 experts. It is also 70% of the people in this country! So, if you say 900 is too little, would you at least agree that 190 million is just about enough! <G>Your second statement about "people like me" (you don't even know me!) is the most laughable... Taken at face value, I can disprove your statement by coming up with just *one* counter-example (besides me) of a non-right-wing-nut who also agrees Clinton should be removed. You didn't get it. I didn't say that you are one (and the only one) of a kind! As a group, you might constitute a small percent of people. But what your group has for company, is what I was referring to. Roughly speaking, 70% are opposed to impeachment and 30% in favor of it. Of that 30, 25 are right-wing nuts and the remaining 5 are people like you! In other words, each of you has as many as five full right-wing nuts for company! True, I don't know you. But I know who you have for company! Good Luck! ;-)