Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick D. who wrote (36313)	1/16/1999 1:41:00 AM
From: woody	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Rick I agree, reminds me of a comment I heard about my companies prior Marketing stategy. If HWP sold sushi they would advertise it as cold dead fish!!! Really these lawyer written releases are frightening. You can cover all that CYA stuff in your safe harbor statement. Right? PS there are a really good bunch of folks over on raging bull and no CP or Paul M...these folks have good constructive discussions about the good and bad of the company without being distracted by the bashers. I think Ill be spending more time over there.

To: Rick D. who wrote (36313)	1/16/1999 1:53:00 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Hey Rick.. Boy!! Who needs "bashers" when DGIVers are too busy bashing thier own company this evening. I agree that this clarification smells. Kind of reminds me of the time I was long on FAMH when they couldnt get anything right! I'm sure the company has already heard about the snafu from different quarters but you get what you pay for (or dont pay for) and any company with a decent PR firm or proofreader would have caught this before it was sent out. I hope this wasnt the next press release JFK was alluding to earlier today!!! Have a nice evening. Jane at the beach with NO SHOES on smackin down a Corona with lime!!! 2w. 3ee

To: Rick D. who wrote (36313)	1/16/1999 3:01:00 AM
From: bullmarket	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 50264

I agree the news clarification was an unnecessary snafu that could have been prevented with better attention to the details involved in a PR. in fact, i wish DGIV had better PR help. However, I am not investing in DGIV for its PR. am investing in it for its ability to sign contracts in foreign countries. The main thing is that DGIV still has the China deal. It is a joint venture with Teltek, a company with an established track record and a presence in many Asian countries. As DGIV delivers its end of the deal, it will get the reward. Perhaps because DGIV is an OTCBB company, its lawyers are being extraordinarily sensitive in its PR wording. In the final analysis, teltek would not have made the deal with DGIV if it were not certain DGIV can deliver. After all, since teltek has the licenses needed in these countries, it could choose any other IP telephony companies. YET IT CHOSE TO PARTNER WITH DGIV!!!! it is obvious that teltek believes DGIV will deliver!!!! An important point to consider: teltek would not have taken the stock option at 1.5 if it did not think DGIV shares would not be worth much more than 1.5 in the future. Knowing the share price involved in the option, I actually feel even better about the deal. Mind you, i still wish we did not have to deal with the correction, but the facts of the deal still remained the same, with or without a PR correction. teltek is in many other Asian countries. teltek now has DGIV shares , so it would be good for teltek to help DGIV succeed. By seeing that Teltek is in other Asian countries that need IP telephony, one can imagine DGIV being a presence in these countries through teltek in the future. The ability to expand its business through teltek is the key reason this deal is important for DGIV . It is important nOT in the immediate revenues, but in the revenues to come, IMO!!!