Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rick D. who wrote (36369)	1/16/1999 3:06:00 PM
From: risk-averse	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

a point brought up by someone on the raging bull thread just now. If the information that was presented in the "correction" was first presented in the "original " version (so we would not have the bad "perception" of a correction), would we have found it to be a positive or a negative? Once we understand that lawyers will always be lawyers, and they will always use languages that would scare off everybody, most of us would say that the information was good (we get a sense that more contract announcements will be coming, or else why would Teltek do the deal with DGIV? and we know that teltek was happy with a 1.5 option price after thoroughly checking DGIV business plan). Let's not focus on the fact that we had a correction (we all agree it could have been better handled) . Let's focus on what was written in it, in my opinion.