Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (46321)	1/16/1999 11:43:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573866

Paul - RE: "it was easy to calculate their real yields at 34%." Can you repost or recalculate how you got that number? Thanks.

To: Paul Engel who wrote (46321)	1/17/1999 12:23:00 AM
From: Maxwell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573866

Priest: <<Maxwell makes quite a few posts from the AMD site in the evenings. Check the timing of his posts - and correct from Eastern Time to Texas Time ! Re: " Maxwell's access to all that fab process and yield data..." Maxwell tried to fake us out about 6 weeks ago claiming AMD had yields of 80 or 90% or so. Thanks to Loose Lip Sanders, it was easy to calculate their real yields at 34%.>> Are you making fun of me or accusing me of inside information? It is OK to joke around but if you are accusing me of inside information then that is not nice. Assumption is the root of all incorrect deductions. I have told you already Kumar is the one that has all the inside information. He said the yield on the 400MHz is LESS THAN 1%! It is funny that he trashed AMD big time after he has increased his estimates from $0.13 to $0.21. I guess he wasn't happy on his AMD investment. Maxwell