SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : shopping.com (IBUY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (389)1/16/1999 10:32:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 435
 
... It(Compaq's bid) values Shopping.com at 900% more than investors were willing to pay for the company just two months ago! ...

fool.com

Actually the 900% understates the situation. If Compaq had bid on the company in October or early November when the price was under $2 (see #reply-6605973 ), they would have:

1. Paid a much lower price/share but also

2. They would have avoided the substantial share dilution (alluded to elsewhere in the article) due to the approximately 2 million shares from the floorless convertible (convertible on Dec. 8) and exercise of some warrants and options which are profitable at $19/share but not at a much lower price.



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (389)1/17/1999 11:01:00 AM
From: afrayem onigwecher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 435
 
Insider Profile: ARDEN MICHAEL D & ANITA EShopping.com

More Info: Quote | Chart | News | Profile | SEC | Insider

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Name:ARDEN MICHAEL D & ANITA ETitle:ShareholderCompany:Shopping.comShares Remaining:N/A

Transaction History

DateActionBrokerSharesTypePriceValue28-Dec-98Planned Sale (144)PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES INCORPORATED83,334Common-$1,151,009

(i) indicates indirect holdings



To: afrayem onigwecher who wrote (389)2/24/1999 5:12:00 AM
From: bambaata  Respond to of 435
 
where did you dream up this goofy name??