SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cirruslvr who wrote (46356)1/17/1999 12:45:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1571682
 
Cirrus,
RE:"So you are saying the problems AMD had were on the .35 process"...

Yes, AMD had trouble ramping .35 so they just ditched it mid-strean in April and started processing .25 wafers. In June is when they really started to ramp. .25 has gone extremely well except with the mask problem on the CXT core. They came a long way in a short time but it caught up with them. Now it's supposedly fixed but they are set back a couple months. If this hadn't happened, Intel and AMD would both be selling 450 MHz chips...
Problem with FEB vs now is that Intel has lucked out. A couple months with a K6-2 450 and a K6-3 before the Katmai would have really helped AMDs image. So no AMD is still a bit behind where as they could have pulled even MHz wise.

Jim



To: Cirruslvr who wrote (46356)1/17/1999 9:06:00 PM
From: Brian Hutcheson  Respond to of 1571682
 
Cirruslvr , the .25 ramp was excellent it went from 1M in Q2
to 3.8M in Q3 then 5.5+ M in Q4 .
Since the k6-3 and initial K7 production will be .25 , they should not have the additional complication of making the process work .
Brian