SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zeuspaul who wrote (5174)1/17/1999 2:55:00 AM
From: Len  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
To the guys with the mounds and feet questions<g>

The InWin cases I have been using have started coming with the mounds you speak of. These mounds have threads built into them, and line up with the appropriate holes on the mobo. These could only be for mounting the mobo there. In addition, the cases have stopped coming with the brass posts that used to serve as a setoff between the mobo and the case frame.

If that weren't enough, I type this post (get it?) on a machine that has its mobo mounted this way, and so far I haven't seen smoke, and it's been at least a month since I transferred to this case. Seen about 20 others done that way, and haven't seen any reports of problems. I am not that knowedgeable about electrical and grounding issues, but it seems that this is the intention of the case manufacturer, notwithstanding Sean's warning.

I'd like to hear more on the subject, since I certainly don't need anymore fried boards.

Len



To: Zeuspaul who wrote (5174)1/17/1999 10:27:00 AM
From: Clarence Dodge  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
ZP

IN A NUTSHELL

Even I'm chuckling now<gg>

Nice bibliography....I needed that too

C

Edit: Do you know anything about the Viewsonic P810 as opposed to the G810?



To: Zeuspaul who wrote (5174)1/17/1999 11:12:00 PM
From: Dave Hanson  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14778
 
Thanks for the summary, ZP. FWIW, I think my own strategy parallels Spot's. If each of the drives is capable of a restore, and if either can be booted too, than one's got as much redundancy as one plausibly needs. I agree about the 500/1,000 meg FAT partitions too.

As was discussed earlier, all this gets easier for me once Drive Image in an NT executable. But in Clarence's and ZP's case (lots of use of Win 9x) you'll want to retain more FAT.