Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (28368)	1/17/1999 11:41:00 AM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Look, I guess I haven't made myself clear.If there is no downside to the womans health by letting the fetus become a living baby upon delivery we agree.What I don't under stand is the objection you have to the health exception.<< can't see how killing the baby and removing it would be "healthier" than removing it alive. >>OK perhaps collapsing the head would allow a two large a head pass through without damage, I don't know. The point is why not let a trained doctor make the decision? You say there can't be such a situation. Fine, then what do you have to lose by allowing this exception in? This is a question that none of the anti abortion people can [or will] answer. Why not? If you are right it will never happen, right? BTW I am talking physical health. pez