Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (28371)	1/17/1999 6:46:00 PM
From: pezz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

<<A sympathetic doctor decides to help her out. It's his decision for her health, who's the wiser?>> Well, my point would be that we allow doctors to make calls like this in other areas. Doctors are always making decisions in matters of disability cases.Doctors tell us if a child has been abused if physical evidence is present in rape cases. It would seem to me that we could easily have a doctor spell it out exactly what the danger was. Perhaps a second opinion would be required. This could be worked out if this was the only objection. pez