SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Howard Henick who wrote (43793)1/18/1999 12:55:00 PM
From: Merritt  Respond to of 132070
 
Howard:

While that's certainly true for a while, eventually the price of the commodity has to reflect the cost of production. The weak dollar of the early seventies (after Nixon took the international dollar off the gold standard) is what forced the OPEC countries to band together, despite all their political differences, and cut production in order to raise the effective price of oil. Right now we have had, the last time I looked, over 40,000 U.S. stripper wells closed in because of non-profitability. Sooner or later an equilibrium will be reached, and oil prices will remain fairly constant no matter how poor economic conditions are. That's probably why the euro and Swiss franc are seen to be "safe haven" currencies (much, possibly most, of the most recent currency drain from Brazil went into those currencies). They're both backed, to a degree, by a commodity (gold).



To: Howard Henick who wrote (43793)1/18/1999 2:35:00 PM
From: Earlie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Howard:

I probably should have been more specific. The point I was attempting to make was that commodities haven't rallied, but that they seem to have, because they are priced in U.S. dollars, at least on these shores. The commodities have not rallied consequentially if viewed from the perspective of stronger foreign currencies against which the U.S. dollar has fallen.

Best, Earlie