Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SSRIF Silver Standard Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: philv who wrote (316)	1/18/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: Squidman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 403

<< all very positive. Now if the POS will co-operate.......>> Well it's certainly very positive, but it looks like we want the POG to co-operate, not POS. Out of that 1404 g/t silver equivalent intersection 1091 g/t is from Gold!! I've frequently seen it presented the other way around, but when gold intersections of up to 40 g/t over 5 m are discussed in terms of "silver-equivalent per tonne" and not mentioned in the text of the release then I know we must be pretty near a bottom for gold. Then again, with a name like Silver Standard - maybe they're just embarrassed by this other Stuff in their cores. Squidman