SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Xpiderman who wrote (46497)1/18/1999 12:28:00 PM
From: gerard mangiardi  Respond to of 1571405
 
if
amd can do .70 for the year the stock will trade over 40. Think of the peg ratio that will imply.



To: Xpiderman who wrote (46497)1/18/1999 12:40:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1571405
 
Xy - RE: "AMD failed miserably in 4th quarter 1998, the once in many year quarter with strong PC demand, especially low-end PC category. "

So you think AMD was a failure in the 4th Q of '98?

Do you consider an almost 50% rise in CPU sales a failure?

Do you consider a 1500% earnings rise a failure?

Do you consider the gaining of marketshare a failure?

Do you consider over 20% of the retail notebook arena a failure?

Do you consider having a greater marketshare in the "low-end PC category", as you stated, than Intel a failure?

The failures of AMD include the inability to correctly make chips, and the stupidity of management. The first failure should be over in a few weeks. Who knows how long the second one will last...



To: Xpiderman who wrote (46497)1/18/1999 1:04:00 PM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 1571405
 
X-Z, your profile states "Avoid losers like AMD and NSM."
I am curious, why would a person like you,
with "solid" investment strategy, waste his
valuable time and post FUD on loser's thread?
To save our souls or what?