Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DMaA who wrote (28414)	1/18/1999 2:08:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey - can you send that same message to JLA please?

To: DMaA who wrote (28414)	1/18/1999 2:14:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Hey David, I found this post extremely useful when dealing with the Schuh's of SI.... techstocks.com

To: DMaA who wrote (28414)	1/18/1999 2:23:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 67261

DMA, what exactly have you added to the discussion? Aside from endless variations of "You're stupid, and I'm not!"? Me, quoting Orwell:The central problem-how to prevent power from being abused-remains unsolved Not-stupid DMA: No it isn't. The founders solved it. Diffuse power evenly amongst 3 coequal branches and X sovereign states and y local communities. People who label thenselves "liberal" or hide behind dishonist (sic) labels like new Democrat and moderate Republican have upset this balance and so are to be resisted at every turn. This particular philosophy sounds somewhat Pilchian to me, anybody who's not a doctrinaire conservative Republican is a filthy liberal. "Substantive debate" in the K style, I guess. I leave it to your indisputably superior mind to explain what this adds to the discussion.