Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Thread Morons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mike.com who wrote (6767)	1/18/1999 2:44:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12810

Woooooooooooooooooooooo. Catch this! I'm surprised Barb didn't beat me to it: To: Mama Bear (344 ) From: Seer Sunday, Jan 17 1999 7:34PM ET Reply # of 480 YAHOO is threatened by IMON, thus the numbers at YAHOO are wrong. Like the 2.5 million float. Someone at YAHOO is being naughty. exchange2000.com

To: mike.com who wrote (6767)	1/19/1999 2:30:00 AM
From: John Sladek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12810

mike, I guess the point of your post was to point out the moronic nature of coming up with a new index? Of course, its not moronic to come up with a new stock index. My point, which you seemed to have missed, was there would likely be a lot of moronic posts on the thread Subject 24993 and that those people who like to troll for morons might want to check it out. Here's my logic: 1. The stocks in the index trade on the OTC:BB 2. Most OTC:BB threads contain more than their fair share of morons. 3. This new thread covers about 20 OTC:BB stocks. => There are likely to be a lot of morons posting on the new thread.QED Hence my suggestion: Could be a good place to lurk for nominees for this thread [Thread Morons]. Regards, John Sladek