Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rico Staris who wrote (16283)	1/18/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

My my! Aren't we in a nasty mood tonight, Ricobuns! Some kinda problem? Knot in your panties? Wondering if you've been lied to one more time? i wonder if he knows that everen is being named in the defamation lawsuit....... Um, for what, exactly? i wonder why kugley never asked for an IR package if he was representing everen when he visited aznt.... Well, could it be he already had one? Or didn't want one? Is this an indictable offense? i wonder if bob knows he is included....for siding with the shorts...and those paid by the shorts......hey BOB! HEY RICO!! Two mistakes in a row here!! "Paid by the shorts", eh? You wanna talk libel? Quite seriously I'm astonished that you actually SAY this stuff. Without a shred of proof. And, sorry bucko, you won't find one. Uh-oh. i wonder why you idiots didnt know that judge george signed off on the default judgement.... I once again--sheesh you're a slow learner--refer you to: exchange2000.com start borrowing money now...for you will spend money defending yourselves soon.....<wink> <wink> lolololololol, this brings us back to a question I've asked often, and one that's never been answered: how does AZNT propose to pay for the extravant quantity of litigation it's entered on recently? Not to mention the suits pending against it?

To: Rico Staris who wrote (16283)	1/18/1999 5:02:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Heh - if you really think you'll get something out of the case, then you must be a plaintiff, yes? Working for the company is something you should consider disclosing. Oh wait—you work for 3Com, hehe heh. Well now, are you lying about working for AZNT or lying about working for 3Com? Or both? ______________________________________________ “i wonder how much i can sell the truck of "idiot" for&#133 i wonder how much i can get for the "scanners" AND HARDWARES of billy”

To: Rico Staris who wrote (16283)	1/18/1999 7:19:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 26163

Eh Ringo, you really need to get some clarity in your posts. Which "Bob" do you mean to include here?: #reply-7344348 ______________________________ “i wonder if bob knows he is included…for siding with the shorts…and those paid by the shorts…hey BOB!” Do you mean SI_Admin Bob, who has never posted anything about AZNT positive or negative? Pretty hard to get defamation and libel out of somebody who hasn't said anything one way or the other. That would be stupid of you, but we expect it by now. Or do you mean Bob Bell of Sweet Factory? He actually did say something about AZNT but only in the context that Sweet Factory doesn't carry ToN, nor do they intend to do so. Pretty hard to get defamation and libel out of telling the truth. Again, pretty stupid of you, yet we're accustomed to it by now. So, which 'Bob' do you mean? A little clarity might help your credibility a tiny bit (maybe).