SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alomex who wrote (22649)1/19/1999 11:50:00 AM
From: MeDroogies  Respond to of 213173
 
But not with a similar cachet value....
Would the majority of people like to watch Miami and Dallas with their storied histories, or Atlanta with their "dirty bird" (which I find quite amusing...as I said, I like ATL)?



To: Alomex who wrote (22649)1/19/1999 11:54:00 AM
From: Dr. Id  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 213173
 

I'm willing to bet Fox is dying because these 2 teams are in

This is a silly argument. Its like saying that New Years will be celebrated by less people because its not being televised from Times Square. The Super Bowl is an event, like a holiday now. EVERYONE watches it, no matter who is playing. Its not like other sporting events. Alot of people just watch it FOR THE COMMERCIALS! I seriously doubt that Apple pulled their spot because of who was playing. You could make the counter argument that in a poor game, the commercials may get the most attention!(though I doubt that this will be a poor game).

I live in L.A. We haven't even HAD a pro football team for several years, and I doubt that the Super Bowl ratings have suffered for it. I'm not a huge pro football fan, but I'm watching it. And if Apple had a commercial in it, I would be anticipating that too.

JB