SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (46627)1/19/1999 2:14:00 PM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Paul, Re: I'd say 50% Retail Market Share isn't too bad at all -

This is the best news. Intel now has much more 'pontential'
than before.

Gary



To: Paul Engel who wrote (46627)1/19/1999 5:41:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Paul - RE: "I'd say 50% Retail Market Share isn't too bad at all"

But closer to 75.1% sure would have been much better. Wouldn't you say?

"considering Intel was GROWING its revenues and PROFITS to an all-time high !

And now, the 400 MHz Celeron could definitely reverse this trend."

What, the profit trend? If there is no Celeron 400, Intel could make much more money selling PII 350s and 400s.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (46627)1/19/1999 8:06:00 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573092
 
Paul, WHAT 400 MHz Celeron? re:<the 400 MHz Celeron could definitely reverse this trend>

I have yet to see a 400 MHz Celeron system advertised in San Diego. Thechipmerchant.com does not list the CPU. When is its introduction?

Petz