Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Stoctrash who wrote (38281)	1/19/1999 3:42:00 PM
From: Bob Strickland	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

I expect a very upbeat conference call this Thursday. Why? Alex has everyone's attention now.

To: Stoctrash who wrote (38281)	1/19/1999 3:58:00 PM
From: BillyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50808

<<Hope he don't say SW this and SW that.... >> And lock himself into Intel processors? I don't think he'll do that, although he may mention it as an option. His SW will be busy doing interactive TV stuff -- it won't have time to do MPEG-2 decode as well? One of the WinHEC Presentations: <<Selecting Microprocessors for Windows-Based PCs Michael Slater, Principal Analyst, MDR/Microprocessor Report surveys the major microprocessor types for systems that run the Windows and Windows NT operating systems. Topics include an evaluation of processor cores, processor buses, L2 cache strategies, instruction set extensions to accelerate 3D graphics, and the role of highly integrated designs. The seminar compares the architecture, implementation, price, performance and power consumption of: Intel Pentium II, Pentium II Xeon, Celeron, and Pentium III processors AMD K6-2, K6-3, and K7 processors Cyrix MII, Jedi, and MXi processors IDT WinChip 2, WinChip 3, and WinChip 4 Rise mP6 and mP6 II Compaq 21164, 21264, and 21364 Alpha microprocessors The seminar will conclude with a forecast of the future roadmaps for each of the processor vendors and an evaluation of where each is likely to be most successful.>>