SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JRI who wrote (20955)1/19/1999 5:52:00 PM
From: Doughboy  Respond to of 77397
 
Chambers was just trying to sell LU the Brooklyn Bridge. He offered to divide markets with LU (no merger)--you keep voice and we'll take data. Of course, he didn't disclose that he thinks the voice market is going to be non-existent 5 years from now. It was a way to delay Lucent's entry into the fray.

As for Cisco being a key supplier to the carriers, Mr. Fun is completely on target that that is the holy grail. Cisco is not there yet but is making in-roads. I read a Merrill Lynch survey of carriers conducted at the end of last year who by a 2-1 margin said that Cisco was their choice for being a key supplier of equipment. Lucent finished a distant 3d or 4th, I believe. ML predicted that in 1999 we would see Cisco begin to land some big ILECs, CLECs and PTTs. Of course, that was before LU did the deal with Ascend, so maybe we'll have to revise.

Doughboy.



To: JRI who wrote (20955)1/20/1999 12:20:00 PM
From: RetiredNow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 77397
 
john, there were never any talks between Cisco and Lucent about a possible merger. There were only talks about a business partnership where both companies could market what their strengths were. Cisco wouldn't sell to Lucent or buy Lucent in a million years.