Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve kammerer who wrote (44136)	1/19/1999 6:41:00 PM
From: Terror	Respond to of 97611

We almost hit 50 today. And it's only Jan. 19th. We are rising....T is rising...MSFT..is rising....LU is rising.....but is it going to settle anytime soon. Slow and steady works for me but this is a hoot. Enjoy tonight.....hopefully the tides will continue to rise the "good" stocks further. Terror

To: steve kammerer who wrote (44136)	1/19/1999 6:45:00 PM
From: HISBROTHER	Respond to of 97611

Someone made a comment several notes ago about a big announcement maybe being made? Did I miss something? I have been tied up watching the Microsoft stock all day and didn't manage to keep an eye on cpq. Though I probably should have maybe I would have missed selling my Microsoft right before the bell.. oh well I still came out 9 grand ahead...but you know the feeling it could have been more!

To: steve kammerer who wrote (44136)	1/19/1999 6:53:00 PM
From: uu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Steve: <OT> > However, if one wants bribery, consider campaign "contributions" In that case the entire US government should be impeached (and in particular the Republican party in the government since according to the documents they received 75% more in contributions by big businesses than Democrats)! > If he had murdered Paula Jones instead of denying her her civil rights the argument would still be... It is said that human beings can come to believe in that which they keep repeating (even though it may totally be just a fantasy)! Republicans keep referring to Paula Jones's law suit as a civil rights matter. Exactly what civil rights of Ms. Jones was violated?! Assuming Clinton did in fact exposed his penis to her and asked her for sexual favors (!), exactly how did Ms. Jones suffer in her career, or in her social standing as a US citizen??!! The judge in the case threw out her case stating even if her allegations were true she suffered absolutely no harm what so ever, and her career and/or social standing was in no form of shape impacted negatively by Clinton's alleged exposure! In any event, this is not the place to discuss this but I could not help it after reading your twisting of facts and the republican way of interpreting that which is the truth!! The Republican party of the late 1990's as defined by Bob Barr, Hyde and the rest of the 13 house managers has turned into a 1942 Nazi party. It is truly sad. I was a registered Republican of many years. But after watching the judiciary committee passing the articles of impeachment I switched to an independent inclined strongly to support the President. Did you notice all republicans in that judiciary committee being white, Christian men all lawyers, while the democrats included blacks, women, whites, and even a gay. You tell me, in the late 1990's which party represents the American society?! Best Regards, Addi Jamshidi