SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Energy Conversion Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Futurist who wrote (3013)1/19/1999 9:03:00 PM
From: WALT REISCH  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8393
 
Battery Technologies for Automotive Applications Forces a Potential
Shift in Technology

January 19, 1999 19:05

LITTLE FALLS, N.J., Jan. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- The global automotive
battery industry may be on the cusp of large-scale change opening the
door for new competitors. This is due to the increasing amount of
high-profile announcements by leading automobile producers and their
plans for hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) in the United States,
Europe, and Japan. Such major Japanese auto producers as Honda,
Toyota, and Nissan are planning to launch new HEV models in 1999,
while U.S. and European automobile producers have new products on the
horizon.

To make these new platforms attractive to consumers and commercially
viable, many of the automobile producers are utilizing such advanced
battery technologies as nickel metal hydride and lithium ion. The
implication of this to the automotive industry is that now the
leading rechargeable battery producers can apply new technologies and
chemistries to the automotive market, which has been dominated by
lead-acid rechargeable batteries.

The breadth of new technology choices includes nickel metal-hydride
(NiMH), nickel cadmium (NiCd), lithium ion, and lithium polymer. It
is apparent that many of the leading automotive original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) are looking to nontraditional suppliers to meet
their future rechargeable battery requirements, as shown below:

Company Developmental efforts Partners

General Motors NiMH Ovonic
Lithium ion polymer Delphi/Valence
Technology

Nissan Lithium ion Sony

Toyota NiMH Matsushita Battery

USABC-a Lithium polymer (metal) 3M/Hydro Quebec

a - Includes Chrysler, Ford, and GM.
A parallel example of a rapid and dramatic change that may occur in
the automotive industry can be found by reviewing the recent
development and commercialization of advanced batteries in the
portable electronics industry. Before the explosion in growth of
portable electronics, nickel cadmium-based chemistry was the battery
technology of choice for small, portable devices. NiCd was developed
in the latter part of the 1940s and met the requirements of portable
equipment users up to the late 1980s.

However, with the rapid miniaturization of portable electronics, NiCd
no longer met electronic 0EMs' demands regarding such important
criteria as light weight and self-discharge. At this point, companies
involved in NiMH technology saw the opportunity to position this
chemistry as a better solution to NiCd. Then in 1993, Sony launched
its lithium ion technology to better meet portable electronics 0EMs',
as well as consumers' increasing needs and demands. This new product
helped strengthen Sony's leadership position in the portable
electronics business because it was able to deliver such value-added
enhancements as lighter weight and longer run devices.

The changing value proposition of the consumers and OEMs is what led
to the commercial development of two new chemistries -- lithium ion
and NiMH. The successful introduction of these two new chemistries,
based on a market-pull, also substantially changed the competitive
structure of the advanced rechargeable battery industry, and allowed
new world-class competitors into this market.

Revenues for the global battery business reached an estimated $30
billion in 1998. Starting, lighting and ignition (SLI) and related
secondary battery applications represent approximately one-half of
the overall market, while primary batteries represent approximately
35% and high-performance secondary batteries represent the remaining
15%, or $4.5 billion. Many of the leading high-performance secondary
battery producers are targeting automotive applications as their next
long-term growth objective.

What is not certain at this time is the final configuration(s) and
commercialization of electric vehicles (EVs) and HEVs that will drive
the final value proposition as well as adoption and implementation of
advanced battery technologies for automotive applications. To help
better understand the performance and value needs of this enormous
opportunity, Kline & Company is launching the multiclient study
GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR ADVANCED BATTERY TECHNOLOGIES IN AUTOMOTIVE
APPLICATIONS, 1998 TO 2008. This study will investigate and analyze
the emerging opportunities in the battery industry. For more
information please contact Michael Corbett at 973-435-3457 or email
mike_corbett@klinegroup.com.

SOURCE Kline & Company

/CONTACT: Michael Corbett of Kline & Company, 973-435-3457, or
mike_corbett@klinegroup.com/

/Web site: klinegroup.com



To: Futurist who wrote (3013)1/19/1999 11:15:00 PM
From: Futurist  Respond to of 8393
 



To: Futurist who wrote (3013)1/20/1999 5:35:00 PM
From: Futurist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 8393
 
This is probably good news for us. When GM's happy, they have $ to put into innovation.

GM earnings jump 13 percent to $1.8 billion
(Last updated 5:22 PM ET January 20)

In DETROIT story headlined "GM earnings
jump..." first four paragraphs rewritten to show
operating earnings, excluding special items, beat
analyst expectations. A corrected story follows.

DETROIT (Reuters) - General Motors Corp.'s fourth-quarter profits jumped 13
percent to $1.8 billion due to strong performance from its core North American
operations and aggressive cost-cutting, the world's biggest automaker said on
Wednesday.

GM's results on a per-share basis were $2.64, a record for a fourth quarter vs.
$2.29 in the year-ago period.

Included in the fourth quarter were total after-tax charges of $420 million to cover
the costs of an employee separation program and underperforming assets overseas.
Without the special items, GM said its fourth-quarter earnings would have been $2.2
billion or $3.25 a share on a fully diluted basis.

The operating results were above the First Call Corp. consensus analyst estimate of
$2.65 a share.

Revenues for the quarter rose to $46.4 billion from $42.9 billion after the company
ramped up production to recover from two labor strikes earlier in the year. GM's
results were driven by its North American automotive operations, which saw net
income more than double to $1.7 billion from $650 million.

After taking into account losses in Latin America and, Africa and Asia, the
company's total income from automotive operations was $1.5 billion vs. $831
million. The company's Delphi Automotive Systems supply unit had income of $280
million vs. $349 million in the year-ago period.

Separately, GM said it will pay about $200 each in 1998 profit-sharing checks to
231,000 employees in the United States. Last year, employees received $750 each.
GM also announced it would resume its share buy-back program in the first quarter
with a targeted completion date of the end of 1999.