SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PairGain Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Larry J. who wrote (28081)1/19/1999 10:45:00 PM
From: IBMikey  Respond to of 36349
 
Thanks LarryJ....Looking for more shares tomorrow!!!!!



To: Larry J. who wrote (28081)1/19/1999 11:02:00 PM
From: margin_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36349
 
The report is very encouraging. Thanks.
Too bad, I can't buy any more.



To: Larry J. who wrote (28081)1/20/1999 12:16:00 AM
From: ELFRAM LYEW  Respond to of 36349
 
I appreciate your excellent post. thank you.
Elfram



To: Larry J. who wrote (28081)1/20/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: OrionX  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36349
 
I've got a question to all about this cable vs telephone connectivity in regards to the internet and all high speed service deliveries.

The question is as follows: Is there any technology development which gives cable the two way point-to-point security and connectivity capabilities inherent in the telephone infrastructure? Specifically, we know that cable, although a good medium for broadcast services, is not a good medium for much else (IMHO) because of it's shared medium/bandwidth ie. there is no junction or switch box on the telephone poles that isolates every home from each other. Am I incorrect in my assertions or is there some technology I've missed that has been deployed so far. So, it would seem, the telephone companies are sitting (for too long) on the best medium for future high speed communications.



To: Larry J. who wrote (28081)1/20/1999 8:19:00 AM
From: max power  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 36349
 
Larry J

thanks for the pair information.

thomas