Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Stock Swap -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tech Master who wrote (16083)	1/20/1999 12:07:00 AM
From: Trader X	Respond to of 17305

I knew we could pull him out of the workwerk. but first, I'm sorry, I was confusing you with "tech". You'll have to forgive me for my senility. Old age, ya know. It was tech who made me feel so bad for recommending YHOO @ $60. I may never get over the humiliation he made me feel ;^) Just do me one favor... don't mention ALYD... brings back bad memories. TX

To: Tech Master who wrote (16083)	1/20/1999 12:19:00 AM
From: Trader X	Respond to of 17305

News you can Use -- Industry Analysis, Semiconductors iiadmin.iionline.com Semiconductor Rally: Too Far Too Fast Analyst: Will Frankenhoff In our last report two weeks ago, we questioned whether or not the underlying fundamentals of the semiconductor sector justified the 83% rise that the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) had experienced from its low of October 8th. Since then, however, the SOX has risen an additional 12% while a group of bell-weather stocks: Intel (NASDAQ: INTC), Novellus Systems (NASDAQ: NVLS), Micron Technology (NYSE: MU), Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN), Motorola (NYSE: MOT) and Lam Research (NASDAQ: LRCX), has moved even more rapidly, advancing an average 15.9% since Christmas. This means that shares of these high-profile companies have appreciated an average 108% since October 8th and now command (with the exception of Lam) an average forward P/E of 33. BancBoston Robertson Stephens analyst Sue Billat said "We can see signs of recovery -- orders are improving and the top U.S. chipmakers are expecting strong results." We agree with that point but we're not so sure that these results will extend past the current, seasonally strong fourth quarter, especially at current valuations. Irrational Exuberance? The handful of bell-weather stocks mentioned above have significantly outperformed all the major indexes over the period, beating the S&P 500 (up 32.3%), the Dow Jones Industrials (up 23.4%) and even the Nasdaq (up 63.9%). While the 33 P/E they now command is 13% lower than the historical 5-year average of 38, we believe that continued limited visibility into Q1 1999 and beyond make the recent run-up suspect in its exuberance. Take for example the fact that the Semiconductor Industry Association is projecting only 9.1% growth in revenue for 1999, 39% off the industry's historical growth rate of 15% and well below the golden days of 1993 to 1995 where the industry grew 30% to 40% annually transforming itself from a $60 billion business to one worth almost $150 billion. Applying this discount relative to the historical P/E would mean that the basket of stocks above would be fairly valued when sporting an average P/E of 25, a 24% reduction from current levels. Slowing Global Economy Furthermore, there is no escaping the fact that global economic growth is slowing going into 1999 and the fact that the big drivers of the 1993 to 1995 semiconductor renaissance -- PC unit growth and networking -- are growing much more slowly (13% to 15% vs. 25%, and 20% to 25% vs. 40%, respectively). The simple fact is that most people believe that any recovery in the industry will be moderate in 1999. Sean Maloney, Intel's vice-president of sales and marketing, said the "Consensus is that there will be a lot of sales in the first half of the year, and it will not be as strong in the second half." But as Terry Ragsdale, an analyst with J.P. Morgan Securities noted, It may not matter: It's the direction rather than the order of magnitude that investors are focused on. Bottom Line: We agree with Ragsdale's assessment but we think semiconductor stocks have moved too far, too fast, on too little news of importance.