Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16467)	1/19/1999 11:00:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

LOLOLOL!! Dude, you really should read the rant-idavit thingie. Your boss has quite a way with &#133ummm&#133words, and stuff, and things like that even, ya know? Be sure to let me know when Tommy Lee Jones arrives at the DTC! LOLOLOL!

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16467)	1/19/1999 11:03:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Respond to of 26163

...aznt will now seek immediate injunctive relief to lift the freeze if dtc does not lift it when federal marshals seize the stock with the enforcement of the default judgements. Like, do you know the meaning of the word "appeal"? Look it up, fall guy.* - Jeff *Assuming it ever gets this far, of course.

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16467)	1/19/1999 11:49:00 PM
From: Hogger	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

I agree, Spidey, and once again the gang is doing just what they did to CYGS stock. They hold themselves forth as great saviors, but they are nothing but vigilantes, and that is NOT a compliment. Look at cygs ... none of the management was hurt. They have progressed perfectly well without the stock soaring ... hell, man, the only people who got hurt were the stockholders who listened to the incessant crap from the great holy sanctimonious FBN group and sold because they were spooked by their libelous attack. Not one, and I repeat, NOT ONE of the management personnel were hurt in the least by the FBNA attacks. Nobody lost their jobs ... nobody had to answer to any agency ... nobody lost their cars, houses or TV sets. The only people hurt , and again I repeat, THE ONLY PEOPLE HURT WERE THE HONEST SHAREHOLDERS. I hope the entire FBN gang are proud of their dealings. They can post all they want about their honesty and intent, but I have decided that it is all just a pile of horse manure. Sure, there may be some problems with any company, and there is with most, but it is obvious that both companies have survived the onslaught of pure unadulterated vindictive self-serving inuendos, twisting and spinning by the FBN'ers. The dictionary defines a vigilante as a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily (as when the processes of law appear inadequate to such members. Throughout history such groups have been responsible for more miscarriages of justice than most of the organized efforts conducted under due process of law. They want to be vigilantes ... let them. If they follow that twisting pathway, they can only eventually bring themselves before the bar of judgement ... due process will prevail in the end. Who suffered under vigilante justice historically? It was for the most part the innocent and those who became victims because they disagreed with, or stood against the prejudices of the hooded riders. Enough of their crap is enough. They have hurt too many people in their quest for self glorification. I just cancelled my subscription to FORTUNE ... without explanation. Shalom mi carnal ... hasta luego y buena suerte. Hogger Adm(Hon) Injun/Mick/Taking another break from fools

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16467)	1/20/1999 12:28:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 26163

there will be an 8k out in near future & janice can try to contort that also like soft taffy. Well, if the company WILL insist on filing stuff with Edgar that more closely resembles soft taffy (or other soft substances) than normal SEC filings, what can I say?

To: Spider Valdez who wrote (16467)	1/20/1999 12:31:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

aznt negotiated stipulation with dtc to lift the freeze. dtc did not honor the agreement. they again negotiated stipulation but dtc's demands were unreasonable. Isn't that amusing! As I heard it, the DTC felt Mikey's demands were unreasonable. mikey fight dtc. who win. i say dtc.