Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : KOB.TO - East Lost Hills & GSJB joint venture -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: grayhairs who wrote (1310)	1/20/1999 11:06:00 AM
From: Salt'n'Peppa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15703

If they were able to get within 3 feet of the barefoot section with Bellvue #2, would the new hole not provide enough of a "path of least resistance" for reservoir fluids, that they could pump cement down Bellvue #1 and be able to shut the BOPs at the surface? It seems to me that if #1 was shut in, reservoir pressure would "prefer" to exit through #2, rather than try to exit through the cracked casing of #1, where we probably still have 8000 psi reservoir pressure. Just a thought. Comments?