SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (44007)1/20/1999 4:07:00 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 132070
 
>>>>>A 400 mhz Pentium II does not type any faster than a 286. And it is only minimally faster on accounting.<<<<<

Mike, I know you are a contrarian, and we love you for it, but - - well, let's just agree to disagree. A 286 is simply obsolete, unless you are running very simple software.

If your assertion is that simple software like WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS is not any faster on a 286 than on a PII, that's wrong. I do agree that WP5.1 for DOS isn't much faster on a 486. But, WordPerfect is much faster on a PII, and if you are talking about WordPerfect for Windows, there is no comparison.

These days Corel is selling WordPerfect 8.0 and you couldn't run it on a 286, even if you wanted to. It does all kinds of stuff, fancy fonts, headers, footers, spell-check, thesaurus, even HTML, better than WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS, my former favorite. And it is faster. It prints faster, it saves files faster, it pulls up files faster, it spell-checks faster. I know, because I am just finishing scavenging all my old files from the old days off the old WordPerfect, and transferring them to the new machine.

Also, I am transferring my QuickBooks and Turbo-Tax from the 486 to the PII, and the PII is much faster there, too. It takes seconds to back-up and restore, versus minutes.

I just had the 286 activated to get files off it before I ditch it. As far as I am concerned, the 286 is a doorstop. The 486 is good enough for a smart typewriter, I agree, but not the 286.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (44007)1/20/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: accountclosed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Bill Meehan on CNBC tonight at 6:30