SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KeepItSimple who wrote (35516)1/20/1999 11:47:00 AM
From: Raymund W  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Wednesday January 20, 11:07 am Eastern Time

Greenspan opposes investing Social Security in stocks

WASHINGTON, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said on Wednesday he
would not support investing Social Security funds in the stock market, as proposed by President Bill Clinton in
his State of the Union address.

''What I do not support and did not support previously was the investment of government funds, especially
Social Security trust funds, in private securities, especially equities,'' Greenspan told the Ways and Means
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Clinton proposed on Tuesday to invest up to $700 billion of Social Security funds in the stock market and subsidize retirement savings accounts
-- the biggest change in the U.S. retirement system's financing since its inception 64 years ago.

Greenspan said government investment in private markets would interfere with the efficient allocation of resources in the economy.

''Because I do not believe that it is politically feasible to insulate such huge funds from a governmental direction, I'm fearful that we will use those
assets in a way, which one, will create a lower rate of return for Social Security recipients, but even a greater concern, that it will create
sub-optimal use of our capital resources and those assets which create our standard of living,'' he said.

Greenspan also told lawmakers his first preference would be to continue to run government budget surpluses and use them to pay down the
national debt, but he added: ''If we have to get rid of the surpluses, I would far prefer reducing taxes than spending it. Indeed, I don't think it's a
close call.''

Related News Categories: currency, international, options, US Market News

Help

Copyright © 1999 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent
of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon.
See our Important Disclaimers and Legal Information.
Questions or Comments?



To: KeepItSimple who wrote (35516)1/20/1999 4:17:00 PM
From: tonyt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>No, if he wanted to say irrational exuberance, he would have said it

When has AG ever said anything clearly. I still say his comments were showed negative sentiment of the market.

BTW, good call on the close today. Will probably gap below $100 on the open (...still, a $300 pre-split POS)