Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ARP - V Argentina Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2032)	1/20/1999 2:25:00 PM
From: Syncrude	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3282

Claude, Then why the rush on the part of Barrick? Almost as important, Argentina seems ready and willing to continue drilling as fast as they can. What do both Barrick and Argentina see in this property & I gather more than what we know....

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2032)	1/20/1999 2:32:00 PM
From: LaFayette555	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3282

Hi Claude. re 'not yet showing 5M ounces.' your substantial experience in these matthers would be apreciated: Dont you belive there is a good probability to prouve this reserve and more on these claims ? Thank you.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (2032)	1/20/1999 6:58:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3282

Claude, Then why the unseemly haste? It is quite apparent from the drilling that this property will expand somewhat. How far?, it could be huge or plateau right now. If it does plateau, then the $5 is OK, but if it goes to three times that then 5 times the $5=$25 is more appropriate as the mine will last longer and have the same mill size(more or less) and thus would be paid off profitable for more years. Think auction, let the bids accumulate and let management keep it's shareholder rights plan, does not Barrick also have a similar plan? Bill