Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Walt who wrote (12804)	1/20/1999 2:52:00 PM
From: mineman	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26850

Noone's explained reasons for this difference so I'm re-posting! Cts. --- U.S.$ per ct. 10.8 --- $1,500 8.4 ---- $3,000 6 ------ $1,500 4.6 -- less than $50 4.2 -- less than $50 3.5 -- less than $50 3.2 -- less than $50 3.0 -- less than $50 2.6 -- less than $50 2.4 -- less than $50 2.2 -- less than $50 1.9 -- less than $50 1.9 -- less than $50 1.8 -- less than $50 1.7 -- less than $50 1.6 -- less than $50 1.5 -- less than $50 1.4 -- less than $50 1.4 -- less than $50 1.3 -- less than $50 1.3 -- less than $50 1.2 -- less than $50 1.1 -- less than $50 1.0 -- less than $50 1.0 -- less than $50 Carat weights from 4.6 to 1.0 are estimated as management only said they recovered 22 stones from 1 to 5 carats averaging 1.9 carats. Management did not say any of the 22 stones were "gem" quality which means they were all valued at under $50 per carat!! Management should explain why they believe this type of discrepency exists!!!