SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Dream Machine ( Build your own PC ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul K who wrote (5394)1/20/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: Sean W. Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
 
FYI...

This is common practice in the unix world. Every unix workstation has a unix host ID. Software license managers like flexlm use this host-id to lock licenses to paricular machines or license servers. Its not hard to do. its not used in the ways this article describes though.

Sean



To: Paul K who wrote (5394)1/25/1999 11:38:00 AM
From: Paul K  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14778
 
Groups call for Intel boycott
"Advocacy groups says users should not buy Intel products until chip ID technology is turned off."

zdnet.com
--------------
This could get interesting, since Intel took a step back late last week and said they were not going to use the ID to invade internet privacy.

Intel says says CPU ID would benefit 'e-commerce' security.

True, BUT, I think they are really setting up the pieces to re-institute software Copy Protection. The software industry would love the chance to limit software installations/registration to one CPU, and the recording industry has been sitting on the side lines waiting for a solution to limit download/playback on one CPU (with serialization of your CPU ID if you make a copy.)

The big hitters are going to back this.

(Anyone remember what fun it was dealing copy protection in the early days with hidden files on your hard drive and laser-etched floppy disks? The dongle seemed to retain its niche though.)