Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TMMI - Total Multimedia -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dennis P who wrote (12157)	1/20/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: taxgun	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 19109

okay, that does it !! i wasnt going to say anything, but now you have really steamed me...put 'em up ! hahahahahahaha i was wondering when we would hear someone say "he didnt have sex within his definition"...blah blah blah both sides of the aisle pretty much agree THE LIAR lied, and misled and didnt tell the truth, and uses words different than the rest of us...george stephanopolis, mike mccurry, dick morris, and robt reich ALL have said he isnt fit to hold the office...now, these guys were all his henchmen, once upon a time...his first cabinet ran for the hills after getting reelected...he has more friends in jail, pleading the fifth, fleeing the country, or DEAD, than all other presidents combined...i say again, he and hillary are very dangerous people...the proof is in listening to the supporters repeat the white house spin, that only gullible people or stupid people would believe...okay carol, your turn jajaja other than tmmi, some of my stocks did well today...ftel up a buck, issm quadrupled (2c to 8c), and wood up about 33%...wonder where our little stock is going ? jp

To: Dennis P who wrote (12157)	1/20/1999 10:14:00 PM
From: Carol S.	Respond to of 19109

Dennis, I think the technicality is in the articles of impeachment and wether the lies were in the civil or grand jury testimony etc.. They were not drawn in a way that was unarguable. It is a mess. I heard him say, in testimony, that he did not have a sexual "relationship" with ms lewinsky. Now in any definition their behavior and relationship (which even included phone sex) was "sexual", even if he wants to claim the act did not constitute sex itself if it wasn't all the way. Saying the "relationship" was not sexual was a bold lie. Under oath. But, it might have been civil instead of grand jury. I do not remember. My problem with him is less with the lies in testimony, though, and more with his lie in his public demonstration of his anger over being supposedly falsely accused of having sex with "that woman"; Madeline Albright being made a public fool after meeting with the Pres and being told that he did not have an unapropriate relationship, she then came out to address the media and said he said this and I believe him; and his sexual activities during a phone call with a senator. That is where I would have drawn the line. If he got impeached for that I owuld have no problem with it. What's his name who used to advise Clinton even when in bed with a prostitute? How serious can one be taking their position and responsibility? Are we supposed to make this behavior now acceptable if done in a political position? Too much stress so it's ok? (That's the excuse given for it by the guy who does the show Politically Incorrect) Maybe 911 operators would be less stressed with a little sexual activity during the phone calls. There has to be a line. .. and it would be a ridiculous comment on my part if the President of the United States had not actually conducted business that way. I can't imagine being a person in the military and thinking that might have been the situation during which the President could have been discussing Middle East discord or anything affecting them. I can't imagine anyone being that irresponsible.