Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (46792)	1/20/1999 9:13:00 PM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572604

Paul, I just knew that I would find you here "winning souls" for Intel. It's hard work and we (the Intel elders) admire your persistence. Why did AMD slide back down after we were told that they would be heading towards 100? 207.82.250.251 Keep up the good work, humble carl

To: Paul Engel who wrote (46792)	1/20/1999 9:17:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 1572604

Paul - RE: "I was told "faster than an equivalently clocked Pentium II"." Yeah, yeah, no one wants to see this written, but on paper the K7 looks superior to anything Intel offers. I don't know too much about hype surrounding the K6's release so can anyone answer these questions for me. Thanks. Did the K6 look great on paper compared to Intel's PPro and PMMX? Did the folks from the Microprocessor Report say anything about the K6 like they have said about the K7, such as something along the lines of -It is better than anything Intel offers. ?