Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Data Broadcasting Corp. (DBCC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jeff who wrote (4394)	1/20/1999 9:18:00 PM
From: Ceez	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5102

She makes one hell of a contrarian indicator!!!! >>>ggg<< She has been added to my people bookmark. Man, I had meetings all day long. Missed all the fun on DBCC. Still have 100% of my short position. The way things are going, I might reconsider and not cover @ 10 but in the single digits. Ceez

To: Jeff who wrote (4394)	1/20/1999 9:40:00 PM
From: Sharon L.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5102

Jeff.....thanks...I saw these right after I posted telling SHG to look at her posts

To: Jeff who wrote (4394)	1/20/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: charger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5102

So, Cathy is some kind of guru with inside information, right? I couldn't resist in joining the fray...this thread is so juvenile and petty that it's laughable. I've been short for the last 3 days, after riding it up the week before, and it's funny to watch how people try to influence the market on these boards. If anyone thinks that what they post on this thread influences the Street, he/she is seriously out of touch with reality. SI is supposed to be a forum for the discussion of objective ideas among "investors", whether they are buyers or sellers of a given security. Once it becomes a tool for an individual's gain/profit, all objectivity is lost, and motives must be questioned. If rumors are spread, versus facts, innocent "investors" can get hurt and the forum loses its sense of purpose. Regards