Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (21738)	1/20/1999 11:17:00 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Thread, For Q* today, the institutional money flow was positive whereas retail money flow was negative, meaning, simplistically, big boyz were buying and little guys were selling. trading-ideas.com I would consider this a good sign. Regards, Ibexx

To: waverider who wrote (21738)	1/21/1999 5:46:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Respond to of 152472

DiamondH, "...I too love the company, but it has been a very poor long term investment...." Well, [to use Irwin's favourite word in the interview], it depends on the price you paid. You could buy it for $9 in 1991, $7 in 1992, $18 in 1994, $23 in 1995, $32 in 1996, $42 in 1997. I bought at several of those prices. I'm VERY happy with my investment and VERY happy with QUALCOMM, the products, the management, the revenue and profit growth, Eudora, Q-phone, Globalstar and all that stuff. I didn't like 2 years late to market, poor connectors, belt clips, failed single mode Q-Phone demand, and a few other minor things. I think Cindy Crawford has a mole? $80 coming up. The old trading pattern won't last forever. Fewer and fewer people are happy to sell in the Natural Home. Mquarkce