Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sotheby's (BID) Auction House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Andrew who wrote (124)	1/21/1999 1:05:00 PM
From: capitalistbeatnik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 236

What about the assertion of internal unrest? Can you cite anything supporting that is not anecdotal?

To: Steve Andrew who wrote (124)	1/21/1999 6:57:00 PM
From: Iceberg	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 236

>If you want to challenge my credibility....go ahead. Steve, I wasn't challenging your credibility. I was challenging the credibility of your post. Those are two different things. You made series of strong assertions about Sotheby's without providing anything in the way of support. I found that not credible. It's people like you who spout off totally unsupported assertions who are a potential danger to unsuspecting investors here on SI. >P.S. Go back to your mail-in MBA and $19.99 trading systems...they might make you enough to afford some e-classes at my Alma-Mater (U. of Penn., Wharton Class of 1981) Again, I'll have to challenge the credibility of another of your unsupported assertions - that I have a "mail-in MBA". It's people like you who are ignorant [in this instance, apparently ignorant about the nature of the University of Phoenix MBA program], but marginally smart enough to think they know something, who really piss me off. >your analytical reading and deductive skills leave much to be desired You may be a Wharton graduate, but I'm not impressed with your ability to read either. You don't seem capable of making the elementary distinction between a challenge to your credibility and a challenge to the credibility of your posts, for example. In addition you don't seem capable of presenting a line of reasoning that is cogent, believable and supported. I would have expected much more from a Wharton graduate. Ice