SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FR1 who wrote (36594)1/21/1999 1:08:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Respond to of 94695
 
" I am sure there are a lot of people forced to sell stock now even though they do not want to and they are within margin limits agreed upon when they bought the stock."

Ah, but there's the rub. When you signed your margin agreement you agreed to let them do all the things that you're complaining about.

"You know, it almost seems like a class action suit is in the making. "

I doubt it, for the above reason.

"All buyers have to go through brokers and brokers are together diverting margin funds to favored stocks and away from stocks they don't favor."

I don't see it that way at all. They're not willing to take the risk. These brokerage houses put a lot of dollars on their bottom lines by loaning margin funds to customers. It is a statement of how profoundly risky these stocks are at these levels if the brokers are choosing to forego profits. I'm not sure a coherent argument can be made that T is at the same risk level as ATHM, despite it's ownership interest.

Barb



To: FR1 who wrote (36594)1/21/1999 5:39:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins  Respond to of 94695
 
Franz; Very good post, and that's what is at the heart of the
internut sell off, how ever some die hards are selling other
stocks rather than to give up their most recent
internut buys at a loss.

So RE Fidelity overnight jerked their margin requirements on most internet stocks up to 80% and lowered the margin on some other stocks to as low as 30%. I don't like this.
Your right for not liking it, and what they hope to gain from
it may backfire in their face..it will to some extent.
Waterhouse has called for 100%..( which means no margin on
internuts ) and now won't trade half of them over the net, you have
to call in..( ring ring ring "all account officers are busy at
this time please call back later..click )
Jim



To: FR1 who wrote (36594)1/21/1999 6:20:00 PM
From: Greg Jung  Respond to of 94695
 
Amazing. However the little old lady that has had T since eons
on margin is well out of margin now since it has more than doubled from its $35 dow dog days.

The list on Schwab is for 50% margin requirements, mostly NUT stocks but a few interesting exceptions:
ITWO
KLAC
WIND

Also I think some IPO stocks may be 100%, but I'm mostly off any margin so I pay no attention. -g-.



To: FR1 who wrote (36594)1/21/1999 7:42:00 PM
From: Caroline  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
So don't buy on margin.

This (pointing to the left) is your money.

This (pointing the right) is Fidelity's money.

You may do anything you want with the pile on the left.

Caroline