Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Healthcare.com Corporation (Nasdaq: HCDC)was [HDIE] -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (10303)	1/21/1999 1:56:00 PM
From: Sandra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15094

Dang Charles, I wish you would just sell all your hdie...then I would have a better to chance to add!! Keep posting all your thoughts maybe you will scare off some holders and I can get my fills. Sandra

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (10303)	1/21/1999 2:28:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15094

Is there any equivalent or roughly similar wording in the HDIE agreement?

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (10303)	1/21/1999 2:50:00 PM
From: jake burns	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15094

chuck: the question should and will be posed to President Murrie on Wednesday regarding the exact nature of the ibm agmt. Until then, quit being contentious.

To: Charles T. Russell who wrote (10303)	1/21/1999 4:16:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15094

Wow. This thread is so quiet, you could hear the proverbial pin drop. It's almost as though one of the thread leaders has been PM'ing people not to respond to any of this "IBM right to sell" discussion. [I can picture the select few doing a double-take right here. Hey! How did he know? Somebody must have told him! Who did that? Why?] Perhaps he knows because there are people on the thread who have begun to realize that there is a chance that the objective approach might have some value, afterall. And, perhaps those people have been passing on PM's and emails to get another opinion on them. Could the secret communications pipeline have sprung a leak? [The next thing to happen will be a bunch more PM's asking each other who did it. Of course, the one(s) who did it won't say, for fear of being removed from the select list ... the "Council of the Sacred Cow".] The post I'm responding to shows the wording of the NEON agreement that was what would have normally been on the HDIE agreement if IBM had been licensed to sell HDIE's solution. More ammo to support my hypothesis. I'm still not going to claim victory, though, because I haven't heard back from IBM .... yet. Perhaps I'm wrong. If so, that would be good for HDIE longs, and I'll apologize. If not ... perhaps David Furstenburg would apologize to me. By the way, I just spent a little time perusing the Yahoo HDIE thread. I rarely go there because the quality of discussion is typically much lower there. Interestingly enough, it seems there might be some disagreement regarding the credibility of certain people. Very interesting reading. Good luck to HDIE longs! Y'all have a nice day. TED