SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (46922)1/21/1999 3:27:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572100
 
Here is the latest on AMDs roadmap as posted by Tom Pabst today.
www5.tomshardware.com

AMD

K6-3

I spoke to Dana Krelle, AMD's vice president of marketing, and he gave me
the latest scoop on AMD's plans. K6-3 is supposed to ship very close to
Intel's Pentium III launch. AMD is trying to release this new CPU with 256
kB on-die L2 cache already prior to Intel's Pentium III release. Most of you
know that K6-3 will run on the same Socket7-motherboards that currently
host K6-2 CPUs, you may only require a BIOS update. The performance of
K6-3 will be high enough to make it very competitive to Intel's Pentium III,
the K6-3 version at 450 MHz will most likely outperform the new Pentium III
500 in many benchmarks. The highly official version says that K6-3 will
definitely ship in Q1/1999, but we know that Q1 ends on March 31. Let's
hope K6-3 will be available earlier than this.

K7

K7 is also still on track, planned release time is Q2/1999. This seems
surprising, because the delay of K6-3, which was expected in January 1999.
K7 will be running in a new unique platform using a slot called 'SlotA', which
is mechanically identical to Slot1, but using a completely different bus
protocol. Thus K7 will not run in Slot1-boards and no Intel CPU will run in
SlotA-boards. K7 will require its own new chipset and AMD will be the first
supplier of one. The bus protocol used by K7 is called 'EV6', known from
Digital's Alpha CPUs. The EV6-bus of K7 is supposed to run at 200 MHz,
offering a significantly higher bandwidth than the 100 or later 133 MHz bus
clock used by Intel's Pentium II and Pentium III CPUs. The performance of
K7 is expected to be significantly above Pentium II or Pentium III level, in
office, multimedia, 3D as well as floating point intensive applications. For
more information about K7 please look at 'Why AMD's K7 will be Intel's
toughest competitor ever'.

K6-2 Pricing

I also asked about the K6-2 pricing. You may remember that Intel's Celeron
366 for Socket370 is currently cheaper than a K6-2 400, although it is faster
than its competitor from AMD. So far K6-2's pricing was adjusted to Intel's
Pentium II pricing, but Intel's new Celerons provide very similar performance
to a Pentium II at the same clock at a significantly lower price. Thus one
would expect that AMD would now adjust the prices to Celeron to stay
competitive. Mr. Krelle denied that AMD is having any actual planes to do
so. "K6-2 is selling extremely well and we don't see any actual reason to
lower K6-2-pricing. We will respond if the market should force us into price
changes, but so far we cannot see that."

K6-2 AFR66

Dana could also give me some more information about the K6-2 AFR66, the
batch of K6-2-CPUs that is only supposed to run at 66 MHz system bus
clock. The vast majority of this batch of several hundred thousand CPUs
went to OEMs and thus into complete systems that automatically use the
correct bus clock. Mr. Krelle stated that only a very small minority should
have gone into the retail market for single CPUs. This might be the reason
why I only received very few emails of people who bought an AFR66-version.
I would still like to remind you though, that a K6-2 300 AFR66 is not the
same as a normal K6-2 300, since it does not run reliably at 100 MHz bus
speed in all the Super7-boards out there. Make sure that you don't find the
marking 'AFR66' on a K6-2 CPU that you buy, unless you are aware that
you have to run it at 66 MHz bus clock.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (46922)1/21/1999 3:31:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572100
 
And Toms latest about Intel
www5.tomshardware.com