To: HRAKA who wrote (7083 ) 1/21/1999 7:02:00 PM From: lawrence lerner Respond to of 8359
You might be right about the public announcement. However, at the time, the stock having come under tremndous pressure, including the down market at the time, JT had received inquiries at the very least about buyin/out of the company. The three month plus several weeks deadline must have had a basis in fact at the time he made that prognostication, whether buyin/out; financing restructuring, whatever seemed to be the best option to maximize shareholder value. That is what the time frame was about -- not just a buyin/out. The $30 to $70, or $25 to $50, whatever, were valuations he put forward as what he believed represented maximum shareholder value based on quality management, research, germplasm, and market, relying on the then market conditions. Many shorts and longs have taken the extremes of all information and presented them as absolutes, which is what one does when one is self-serving. That is what I feel the issue is: not what date a deal is deadlined at, or how much an acquiring company should pay in order to receive fair value. This is the story of what I believe to be a terrific growth company Having short term debt considerations, he set about strengthening the abtx foundation by pursuing strategic options, ONE of which was to have a buyin/out considered. What would I do if I had been in his position about a time frame? Well, I suppose since I'm long term long and have faith in his leadership based on past performance, I obviously agree with his method, even if it has yet to bear fruit. Hard to second guess this one. If he hadn't reacted as he did, he would not be JT, in which case I might not be long term long. (Not blind faith, mind you, people do make mistakes; but, mistakes can be remedied by our only true asset -- so long as it lasts -- time). I guess you choose to manifest the long term faith you have in the company by hedging with your IRA. I just do it differently. Good luck to both of us. IMHO, of course.