SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silicon Graphics, Inc. (SGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill Holtzman who wrote (5621)1/21/1999 8:24:00 PM
From: Don Green  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14451
 
> I think we were both surprised to see folks jumping in to SGI on such a lousy day for stocks. Not really, I think many have been waiting for a chance to justify getting into SGI.. It is the cheapest name value tech around. It is a fallen favorite that many would like to see rebound. The real question is will people hold it higher than their earlier entry price which for most was $20-35..a.k.a. get their capital out and move on, or will they finally maybe make some profits.. Time will tell. The MER upgrade really helped. I know Goldman Sachs is still bruished from 18 months ago..

regards
Don



To: Bill Holtzman who wrote (5621)1/21/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: Larry Brew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14451
 
Bill, Remember me. I recognize some names. I'm one of those guys
that jumped back in after about a 15 month absence. The sting has
gone away. I have been watching awhile and considered around 13
or so, but was looking for something positive. The insider buying
around 10 got my attention. It rarely lies. I should have grabbed it then.
I think last year was too early for the sector from a wallstreet
point of view. With video streaming getting some attention again,
I think the server sector should rally. I need to catch up with the
company again. They do still make servers don't they. :-)
Off to a more in depth DD.



To: Bill Holtzman who wrote (5621)1/21/1999 9:56:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Respond to of 14451
 
"Interesting" is not the word that pops into my head -- more like "deceptive." But that's JMHO.

Are the REQUIRED (you say "must buy") to buy them? Then isn't that a liability that should be accounted for?

JMHO, and neither a legal nor investment opinion.