Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DSPetry who wrote (16665)	1/21/1999 7:33:00 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 26163

four 6s ... where else can we watch pumpsters in motion from the comfort of our swivel chairs ..... as to why we want to, well you got me there .... but then i never could understand why people did origami either Something's going on?? #reply-7410998 ... what, what? .... and prove it.

To: DSPetry who wrote (16665)	1/21/1999 7:39:00 PM
From: Spider Valdez	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 26163

1 DOWN, MANY TO GO!!! FELLOW PENNY STOCKBASHER BITES THE DUST!!! sec.gov --- COMMISSION OBTAINS ORDER OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AGAINST RONALD REECE The Commission announced today that Judge Patrick Michael Duffy of the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina entered an Order of Permanent Injunction and Other Relief against Ronald V. Reece (Reece) restraining and enjoining him from further violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act). Reece consented to the entry of the permanent injunction without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's complaint. The Order also directed that Reece pay a $10,000 civil penalty within 30 days following the entry of the Order. The Commission's complaint, filed on July 1, 1998, alleges that Green Oasis Environmental, Inc. (Green Oasis) and Carraway published a series of false and misleading press releases prepared by the public relations firm the company retained, owned and controlled by Raymond C. O'Brien (O'Brien). Carraway paid O'Brien and others to publish purportedly objective descriptions about the company and to encourage positive discussion about the company in Internet news groups. Carraway and O'Brien used these false press releases to increase investor interest in the company. Carraway and O'Brien encouraged Ronald V. Reece (Reece) to publish positive information about the company in numerous Internet news group messages he wrote and in an electronic newsletter he published about the company. In his publications, Reece claimed to be merely an interested investor and denied receiving any consideration from the company. In fact, the company gave Reece a valuable discount on his purchase of the company's securities and paid his travel expenses, all of which he failed to disclose in his publications. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants Green Oasis and Carraway to prevent their future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; a permanent injunction against defendant O'Brien to prevent his future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a) and 17(b) of the Securities Act, and Sections 10(b) and 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and a permanent injunction against defendant Reece to prevent his future violation of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act. The complaint also seeks an accounting, disgorgement, prejudgment interest and civil penalties from defendants Carraway and O'Brien and civil penalties from defendant Reece. The commission's complaint also seeks disgorgement from Mary Ann Carraway of the gains from her sales of Green Oasis securities. Judge Duffy previously entered an Order of Permanent Injunction against Green Oasis in August 1998. [SEC v. Green Oasis Environmental, Inc., William D. Carraway, Raymond C. O'Brien and Ronald V. Reece, Defendants, and Mary Ann Carraway, Relief Defendant, Civil Action No. 2:98-1913-23, D.S.C.] (LR-16032)

To: DSPetry who wrote (16665)	1/21/1999 7:43:00 PM
From: Hogger	Respond to of 26163

Whoa thair podner, I specifically stated that present bashers are not included .... uh, didn't I? How could anybody ever draw the conclusion that anyone here is being paid in any manner. These are vigilantes we are dealing with on this thread. They are here to uphold the integrity of the penny exchanges of the world and to bring truth, light and hope to the downtrodden masses. These are purely altruistic personages. There is no vindictiveness in any of them. Janice is only here as a matter of honour. And the really, really wonderful news is that they just don't make mistakes. Of course, there is a Santa Claus. As sure as the day is long and the FBNA is a great noble institution of enlightenment without prejudice, there is indeed a Santa Claus. Don't let any evil hypsters tell you different. Hogger