Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearded One who wrote (6398)	1/21/1999 8:43:00 PM
From: s. bateh	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 10072

Bearded one: You forgot this part: Although the company beat Wall Street analysts' expectations of earnings of 5 cents per share, quarterly income dropped 47 percent, year over year. Iomega lost money in the first three quarters of 1998, a company representative said. "The trend is the return to profitability, even if it is decreased over last year."

To: Bearded One who wrote (6398)	1/21/1999 9:44:00 PM
From: Kevin	Respond to of 10072

For every bad headline there is a good one: 01/21 16:06 Iomega reverses loss trend with quarterly profit

To: Bearded One who wrote (6398)	1/21/1999 9:49:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10072

<<I'm not saying that the article I quote below is fair. I'm just posting it here so that people can realize that there are others who are commenting on Iomega's report in a negative fashion, and that the negative viewpoint could very well be the dominant one, which will hurt the stock in the short run.>> Yeah, I know what you mean, remember Red Harrings article right after 3rd Q numbers? It read something like "Iomega still sucks" (keep in mind that that was the TITLE of the article.) Zead