Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: j g cordes who wrote (29068)	1/21/1999 9:57:00 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 67261

<<What? I assume you mean that no sex without marriage? And no marriage without a blessing from organized religious practices? Help me with your statement.>> Not for the populace at large, since many do not align themselves to an organized religion. My statement was a straight forward. A man has no rights to a woman that he does not have virtuous intentions toward. Any thing less is abuse. I am not saying that the "anything less" MO doesn't sometimes involve mutual consent. In fact, there in lies the rub. Show me a case where there is mutual and virtuous intention between the parties regarding one another's sexuality and I'll show you an end to the need for all of this politicizing of peoples sexual privacy. I gotta go. So, get over it.