SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tapcon who wrote (5829)1/22/1999 9:05:00 AM
From: James Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78748
 
<<2. What am I missing here: when I look at these stocks on Yahoo, I see most with earnings/share MUCH less than dividend/share. How is this sustained over time?>>

GAAP earnings is not the way to look at a REIT because of the accounting for depreciation. This is why real estate was always used as a tax shelter, because you could generate tax losses (negative net income) but still have very positive cash flow. Depreciation is often a non-economic charge in the real estate world - a property often appreciates instead. So look at cash flow, not earnings.

If you go back to the last downturn in 1991-94, you are going to find that none of these REITs existed. What were called REITs then were a different animal, and will be a misleading comparison. What I look at is leverage - real estate owners went into the last downturn with 90% debt, and lots of them got completely wiped out. Be careful with REITs that have debt/capital of much over 50%.

Your point about safety on the downside, given their lousy performance in August, is well taken. A lot of us REIT fans were VERY surprised when they dropped with the market. So no promises there, but intuitively I cannot imagine REITs paying the yields they are paying taking the full brunt of a bear market.

One additional caveat on REITs. They are boring beyond belief. I tend to get bored out of my REITs long before I get scared out of them.

Jim